It seems like every time I release a piece of apt-based software (apt-watch is the latest example), I get at least one RC bug report from a user who's using an unofficial apt release, informing me that I have "broken" dependencies. The problem is that the libapt packages are hidden virtual packages, and so users don't realize that they are provided by apt -- they think I've added a dependency on some package not in the archive.
I assume there are good technical reasons for this, but would it be possible in the future to make a real libapt package to reduce user confusion? Daniel -- /-------------------- Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -------------------\ | You will soon forget this. | \-- Does your computer have Super Cow Powers? ------- http://www.debian.org --/
