>From http://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonS3/latest/dev/UsingRRS.html:
"Reduced redundancy storage is designed to provide 99.99% durability of objects over a given year. This durability level corresponds to an average annual expected loss of 0.01% of objects. For example, if you store 10,000 objects using the RRS option, you can, on average, expect to incur an annual loss of a single object per year (0.01% of 10,000 objects)." Doesn't that seem bad? Losing even a single file in duplicity's incremental chain is not great. -- https://code.launchpad.net/~daniel-muller/deja-dup/deja-dup/+merge/219094 Your team Déjà Dup Developers is requested to review the proposed merge of lp:~daniel-muller/deja-dup/deja-dup into lp:deja-dup. _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~deja-dup-team Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~deja-dup-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
