Yeah, "wow" is the right word. ;)

Yep, by using LCL and FCL (i.e. by switching from Delphi to 
Lazarus/FreePascal) you can use your Delphi code, and have it compile for 
Linux, MacOSX, *BSD, etc. (if only you're not using any explicit WinAPI calls 
or depend on some windows-specific stuff in your code).

No, Neither LCL nor FCL have *any* .Net "integration" whatsoever. LCL and FCL 
are just *component libraries*, allowing a programmer to write one code that 
will work across many operating systems (Win, Lin, Mac) and many GUI toolkits 
(win32, GTK/GKT2, Qt, etc.).

In my humble opinion, Lazarus is allowing the once-vibrant Delphi community to 
have some hope of re-flourishing. Already there are several visible 
Lazarus/FreePascal (LCL/FCL) projects out there (take PeaZip for one).

Cheers
Mike

Dnia wtorek 10 czerwiec 2008, Anu Rang napisał(a):
> Wow. Did I understand that right? Does that mean that by using LCL
> and FCL I can get my delphi program to be platform independent? Is it
> because of .Net integration? Excuse my stupid questions:)
>
> Anu Rang, TotallyFreeEnergy
> http://totallyfreeenergy.zxq.net
>
> --- In [email protected], Michał Andrzej Woźniak
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > Just thinking... Wouldn't Lazarus/FreePascal
> > (http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org) be a better solution?
> >
> > LCL (Lazarus Components Library) and FCL (Free Components Library)
>
> are close
>
> > to being completely compatible with the VLC, and FreePascal offers
>
> Delphi
>
> > compatibility mode.
> >
> > And, what's most important, once written code compiles and runs on
>
> Windows,
>
> > Linux, Mac, BSD and then some, not requiring *any* runtimes/VMs on
>
> the client
>
> > machine (opposite to Java).
> >
> > Oh, and it's Free as in Speech. Which might be another plus in your
>
> project.
>
> > I am using Lazarus for quite some time and I would definitely
>
> consider it
>
> > worth a try for you.
> >
> > Cheers
> > mike
> >
> > Dnia wtorek 03 czerwiec 2008, Frederick Huddleston napisał(a):
> > > Hello Friends,
> > >   Thank you for your comments.   I have spent the last 12 years
>
> writing
>
> > > free Delphi software for teachers to teach STEM (Science,
> > > Technology,Engineering, and Mathematics) to children using a
>
> submarine
>
> > > simulator to travel the oceans.    My vision is that it goes
>
> international
>
> > > so all of the earth's can work together on the same virtual
>
> mission as a
>
> > > singe team in multiple countries under the direction of their
>
> teachers.
>
> > > All the world's children can be come shipmates, and war will
>
> become and
>
> > > obsolete human behavior.
> > >
> > >   I like Delphi, however the software must also run on Linux and
>
> Macintosh.
>
> > >   I now realize that for it to go international, Java seems to be
>
> the best
>
> > > for all children's computers on the planet Earth.
> > >
> > >   Any conversion advice is greatly appreciated.
> > >
> > >   Regards,
> > >   Fred Huddleston
> > >
> > > Peter Luijer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >           Hi Fred,
> > >
> > > Are you serious?
> > > That's the same as asking if a car can be converted to an
>
> airplane...
>
> > > Both are ways of transportation and each great at what they do,
>
> but you
>
> > > can't just convert them
> > > from one to another.
> > >
> > > Possibly there are tools that are able to aid you in porting code
>
> (like
>
> > > there are tools for C-header
> > > files to pascal-files), but most of the work has still to be done
>
> by a
>
> > > programmer.
> > >
> > > Greetz,
> > >
> > > Peter.
> > >
> > > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> > > Van: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Namens
>
> > > Fred
> > > Verzonden: dinsdag 3 juni 2008 10:28
> > > Aan: [email protected]
> > > Onderwerp: [delphi-en] Delphi to Java
> > >
> > > Hi Everyone,
> > > Is there any software that helps convert my Delphi 5 code to Java?
> > >
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Fred Huddleston
> > > Home 219-884-5302
> > > Cell 219-789-5993
> > >
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply via email to