Hi, Dave.

Thanks for your insight. After the first two days I considered doing just that, 
keeping to the good old components I knew. But I considered it might be 
something really stupid I might be doing and, as such, I tried to figure it 
out. I'd like to thank Kevin as well, but I have already posted it on 
forums.talkto.net (right after I posted it here) and I think it is time to find 
alternatives because I can't afford much time to solving such small problems. 
I'll check the source code as soon as I can and, after solving the problems, I 
may post it in the forums and switch back to Jedi in order to keep everything 
in a "single" package. 

One thing that I miss in the Jedi project is what's new or different from the 
original components. Am I wrong or do I have to go through the code to find 
what is inherited and what is changed?

Thanks again for your help.

Eduardo

--- In [email protected], David Smith <djsmith_1...@...> wrote:
>
>  When I looked at them I saw serious bugs in several components so it is not 
> surprising if you found a bug. A small number of overworked people put that 
> gigantic batch of components together plus all the documentation (check out 
> megademo.exe in jvcl\bin directory). You could report the bug to them or try 
> and fix it yourself (but good luck recompiling those confusing packages). If 
> there's a feature in that component that you just can't find anywhere else, I 
> would extract the source code, fix it, and compile it into a separate 
> component. You could email it to whoever is in charge of bug fixes after you 
> have properly tested it if you want to see that project continue to be 
> useful. 
> 
> Dave
> 
> --- On Sun, 4/26/09, ecostas1 <ecos...@...> wrote:
> 
> From: ecostas1 <ecos...@...>
> Subject: [delphi-en] Novice's problems with Jvcl
> To: [email protected]
> Date: Sunday, April 26, 2009, 8:16 PM
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>     
>             
>             
> 
> 
>       
>       Hi, I'm starting to use JVCL a little more seriously and I have some 
> issues. I'm afraid I'm about to bug you a lot;)
> 
> 
> 
> Well, here it goes:
> 
>       I placed a TJvDBGrid in a form. My first try was with TJvDBMemo. I 
> placed one on the form, filled the datasource and datafield fields, set the 
> Grid Edit Controls and everything worked. Next I tried to place a 
> TJvDBComboBox. I filled the items property and used EditControls again. When 
> I ran the program the grid worked fine, I could see and choose one of the 
> values on the list but, as soon as I moved to another record the field 
> associated with the TJvDBComboBox would go blank, i.e., on the beforePost 
> event, the field is not assigned though the TJvDBComboBox has the right value 
> and itemIndex. What am I missing?
> 
>       
> 
>       Before I uninstalled version 3.33 and installed version 3.36, whenever 
> I tried to compile a project with runtime packages in Delphi 2007 it 
> complained of a missing JvCoreD10R package, though all packages should be 
> *11*. I had the problem in 2 of my 3 projects. It didn't help to uninstall 
> and install Jvcl and Jcl, even manually deleting every j*.dcu and j*.bpl in 
> the computer. I solved it in one of the projects by dropping the form and 
> writing it again from scratch. But the other project has several forms and I 
> wish I didn't have to do everything again or that I knew exactly what to look 
> for. 
> 
> 
> 
>       I tried to install version 336 on my laptop with Vista and compile the 
> very same projects on it using Delphi 2007. On the laptop I'm getting a 
> "Required package 'O407_r100'" . If I try to compile without runtime 
> packages, I get a "Unit JvDBGrid was compiled with a different version of 
> JvComponent. TJvForm" message. Naturally, I have already uinstalled jvcl and 
> jcl, deleted every jv*.* and j*.* that could consider related to the packages.
> 
> 
> 
> TIA,
> 
> 
> 
> Eduardo       
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  
> 
>       
> 
>     
>     
>       
>        
>       
>       
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>       
> 
> 
>       
>       
> 
> 
>       
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>


Reply via email to