RE: [DUG]: about SET

[Myles Penlington]

I think SETS are stored as bitmaps, in which case the only valid count is the number 
of items in the base type.
Myles.

-----Original Message-----
From:   Jim Zheng [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:   Friday, February 19, 1999 4:29 PM
To:     Multiple recipients of list delphi
Subject:        RE: [DUG]:  about SET

So that means, there is not faster way than looping through whole set to
check each one from base type appears in the set.
But is there any faster way to know the count of a set, or looping is the
only way?

application/ms-tnef