> Dear Aaron,
>
> Please suggest me if I am wrong.
>
> Singleton is not suitable to me. I got several const objects of same class.
>
> Best Regards
> leigh
The original message was not clear as to your business needs but I hope that
enough material has been presented for you to derive a suitable solution.
You can remove the singleton part of the model and still allow the read-only
property... You will still need to create the object at runtime... There is no
const syntax for creating instances of a TObject descendant....
--
Aaron Scott-Boddendijk
Jump Productions
(07) 838-3371 Voice
(07) 838-3372 Fax
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
New Zealand Delphi Users group - Delphi List - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Website: http://www.delphi.org.nz
- [DUG]: Advanced Delphi course Antony Gardiner
- RE: [DUG]: Advanced Delphi course Jason Coley
- [DUG]: Declare const object leigh
- Re: [DUG]: Declare const object Aaron Scott-Boddendijk
- Re: [DUG]: Declare const object leigh
- Re: [DUG]: Declare const obj... Aaron Scott-Boddendijk
- Re: [DUG]: Declare const... leigh
- RE: [DUG]: Declare c... Dennis Chuah
- RE: [DUG]: Declare c... Nic Wise
- Re: [DUG]: Declare c... Aaron Scott-Boddendijk
- Re: [DUG]: Declare const obj... Aaron Scott-Boddendijk
- RE: [DUG]: Declare const obj... Cory Shanks
- Re: [DUG]: Advanced Delphi course patrick . dunford
- RE: [DUG]: Advanced Delphi course Cory Shanks
- RE: [DUG]: Advanced Delphi course Tony Sinclair
- RE: [DUG]: Advanced Delphi course Antony Gardiner
- Re: [DUG]: Advanced Delphi course Eamon Reyn
- RE: [DUG]: Advanced Delphi course Nahum Wild
- RE: [DUG]: Advanced Delphi course Blackie, Nikolai
