No, its proof that with a LOT of work, it is viable.
N
----- Original Message -----
From: "Martin Paulo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Multiple recipients of list delphi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2000 2:11 PM
Subject: RE: [DUG]: Offtopic (Sort of)
> So then JBuilder is indeed proof positive that with a little work option
> 2 is a viable one...
>
> Martin
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> [snip]
> > > I meant that architecturally JBuilder is a wonderful example of a
> > > product built using option 2 - surely it is a nice fat Java client
> > > application...
> >
> > Yup, it is, but its NOT that much fatter than Delphi 5. JB4
> > has been running
> > on my machine all day, and its up to about 54meg. Delphi
> > usually runs at
> > about 35-40, but can blow out to over 200 if it screws up.
> >
> > N
> >
> > --------------------------------------------------------------
> > -------------
> > New Zealand Delphi Users group - Delphi List -
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Website: http://www.delphi.org.nz
> > To UnSub, send email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > with body of "unsubscribe delphi"
> >
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
> New Zealand Delphi Users group - Delphi List - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Website: http://www.delphi.org.nz
> To UnSub, send email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with body of "unsubscribe delphi"
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
New Zealand Delphi Users group - Delphi List - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Website: http://www.delphi.org.nz
To UnSub, send email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with body of "unsubscribe delphi"
