> It's a right pain to have to handle this as a special case
> (using SP's etc to solve).
Maybe this points towards the real problem, that SPs are perceived to be a
pain? We use Visual Studio to edit and debug stored procedures on a SQL
Server 7 database and it is very simple, with code highlighting, and
tooltip-style variable inspection.
I have heard the argument that all updates to a database should be done
through stored procedures to easily ensure consistency (for a complex
operation) and enhance security as users no longer need permissions to
update tables directly.
Paul Ritchie
Radio Computing Services.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
New Zealand Delphi Users group - Delphi List - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Website: http://www.delphi.org.nz
To UnSub, send email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with body of "unsubscribe delphi"
- Re: [DUG]: embedded database. Steve Peacocke
- Re: [DUG]: embedded database. Ian Fear
- RE: [DUG]: embedded database. Patrick Dunford
- RE: [DUG]: embedded database. Gary T. Benner
- Re: [DUG]: embedded database. Matthew Comb
- Re: [DUG]: embedded database. Xander van der Merwe
- Re: [DUG]: embedded database. Neven MacEwan
- RE: [DUG]: embedded database. Myles Penlington
- Re: [DUG]: embedded database. Neven MacEwan
- RE: [DUG]: embedded database. Myles Penlington
- Re: [DUG]: embedded database. Paul Ritchie
- Re: [DUG]: embedded database. David Brennan
- Re: [DUG]: embedded database. Neven MacEwan
- Re: [DUG]: embedded database. David Brennan
- Re: [DUG]: embedded database. Neven MacEwan
- RE: [DUG]: embedded database. Paul Ritchie
- Re: [DUG]: embedded database. David Brennan
- RE: [DUG]: embedded database. Paul Ritchie
- RE: [DUG]: embedded database. Paul Ritchie
- Re: [DUG]: embedded database. Neven MacEwan
- RE: [DUG]: embedded database. Paul Ritchie
