I'm brand new to this discussion. I like Blob and don't mind "bucket".
"Collection" has so many class implementations that it is bound to be
confusing.
Same for "Container".

Instead of "bucket" we could use:

  can
  canister
  cask - I like this one
  hod
  kettle - I like this one also especially for a "blob"
  pail
  pot
  scuttle
  vat

Ed
                                                                       
 Windows Developers Newsletter Archive:            
http://seussjr.austin.ibm.com/egb/newsletter
                                                                       
 VISTA White Paper:                                
http://seussjr.austin.ibm.com/egb/vista/vistaversions-1_1.doc
                                                                       




T/L none; Outside: 1-512-636-1853 FAX none
[email protected]
HOME


                                                                       
             Michal Fojtik                                             
             <[email protected]                                         
             om>                                                        To
                                       [email protected]
             08/26/2010 07:22                                           cc
             AM                                                        
                                                                   Subject
                                       Re: 'A Blob by any other name'...
             Please respond to                                         
             deltacloud-...@in                                         
             cubator.apache.or                                         
                     g                                                 
                                                                       
                                                                       




On 26/08/10 08:13 -0400, Tomas Sedovic wrote:
>Hey Marios,
>
>I'm for keeping the word "blob". Every dev already knows what that is --
it's used in databases, git, et cetera.
>
>However, I don't like "container" as much. If I just saw the two words
without a context, I would perhaps consider them synonyms (blob ==
"container for bits").
>
>My suggestion is "collection", if you can afford such a general name. In
my mind it's much clearer that blobs form (or belong to) collections rather
than containers or buckets.

I don't want to 'troll' or something, but I'm not very sure about
term 'collection', because we already using it in API.
So to avoid confusion in terms, I'm voting for 'bucket' or 'directory'.

  -- Michal


>Thomas
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
>To: [email protected]
>Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 11:29:59 AM GMT +01:00 Amsterdam /
Berlin / Bern / Rome / Stockholm / Vienna
>Subject: 'A Blob by any other name'...
>
>Hi, I have so far been using the nouns 'Container' and 'Blob' for the
>entities in our (developing) cloud storage API. It was always the
>intention to change these at some point so I thought it would be a good
>idea to get some input from the wider group. A 'blob' is a uniquely
>named collection of data, stored as a single entity (in S3/CloudFiles
>'Object'). A 'container' is a uniquely named grouping of blobs (in S3
>'Bucket' and CloudFiles 'Container').
>
>So, any ideas about what we should be calling these 'things'? Do we need
>to change the current names at all?
>
>marios

--
--------------------------------------------------------
Michal Fojtik, [email protected], +420 532 294 4307
Ruby / Ruby On Rails Developer
Deltacloud API: http://deltacloud.org
--------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to