We chose @Veto originally, as it didn't deviate from the spec's veto() method, so should be less of a learning curve. I don't like @Deactivate as it makes it sound like you have to activate other beans. @Ignore is too overloaded a term for me to be comfortable with it (@IgnoreWarnings). I like @Exclude as it's closest to what makes most intuitive sense.
On 24 Dec 2011, at 09:33, Christian Kaltepoth wrote: > Perhaps we should build a list of all suggestions and then start a > vote which one to use. > > I think these are the names that were suggested: > > @Veto > @Skip > @Exclude > @Deactivate > @Ignore > > > > 2011/12/23 Gerhard Petracek <gerhard.petra...@gmail.com>: >> hi arne, >> >> would be also ok for me -> +1 >> >> regards, >> gerhard >> >> >> 2011/12/23 Arne Limburg <arne.limb...@openknowledge.de> >> >>> What about @Exclude? >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Arne >>> >>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- >>> Von: Gerhard Petracek [mailto:gerhard.petra...@gmail.com] >>> Gesendet: Freitag, 23. Dezember 2011 21:28 >>> An: deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org >>> Betreff: Re: [DISCUSS] [DELTASPIKE-8] @Veto >>> >>> +0.5 for @Skip >>> as mentioned in the original thread @Veto is accurate from a technical >>> perspective, but it sounds strange for users who aren't aware of the >>> mechanism behind. >>> >>> if we are talking only about @Veto vs @Skip and not about the other >>> alternatives: +1 for @Skip >>> >>> regards, >>> gerhard >>> >>> >>> >>> 2011/12/23 Dan Allen <dan.j.al...@gmail.com> >>> >>>> Veto is rationally the most appropriate since it directly translates >>>> to calling ProcessAnnotatedType#veto() >>>> >>>> However, I'd like to offer one other alternative: >>>> >>>> @Skip >>>> >>>> While veto describes what the extension is doing internally, skip is >>>> how the developer perceives the result of the action. The class is >>>> "skipped over" during the scanning process. This is similar to the >>>> suggestion @Ignore, and I think both would get the point across equally >>> well. >>>> >>>> -Dan >>>> >>>> p.s. Apologizes for dropping the rest of the thread. I wasn't >>>> receiving messages when this thread started. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Dan Allen >>>> Principal Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action >>>> Registered Linux User #231597 >>>> >>>> http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen#about >>>> http://mojavelinux.com >>>> http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction >>>> >>> > > > > -- > Christian Kaltepoth > Blog: http://chkal.blogspot.com/ > Twitter: http://twitter.com/chkal
