This is very readable. +1 On Jan 3, 2012 4:52 PM, "Gerhard Petracek" <[email protected]> wrote:
> as discussed with mark we could think about details like inProjectStage vs > ifProjectStage, however, basically +1 > > regards, > gerhard > > > > 2012/1/3 Gerhard Petracek <[email protected]> > > > hi @ all, > > > > we came up with a new idea to merge @Veto, @ProjectStageActivated and > > @ExpressionActivated. > > arne combined [1] some of the previous suggestions and the result would > > solve the @Veto naming discussion as well. > > > > if we merge those features, we would get something like: > > @Exclude > > @Exclude(inProjectStage=Production.class) > > @Exclude(notInProjectStage=UnitTest.class) > > @Exclude(onExpression="myProperty==myValue") > > @Exclude(onExpression="[my custom expression syntax]", > > interpretedBy=CustomExpressionInterpreter.class) > > > > regards, > > gerhard > > > > [1] http://markmail.org/message/6rbzbrtzye3y65lu > > >
