+1 regards, gerhard
2012/2/13 Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de> > I'd say we just push the release-branch + the release-tag and then merge > them over to master. This is only needed to upgrade the versions. > > LieGrue, > strub > > > >________________________________ > > From: Gerhard Petracek <gerhard.petra...@gmail.com> > >To: deltaspike <deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org> > >Sent: Monday, February 13, 2012 1:49 PM > >Subject: release branches > > > >hi @ all, > > > >since a new commit was pushed before we merged back the release branch, we > >have to discuss release branches right now. > > > >the options i see right now are: > >1) we push the external named release-branch as it is (+ tag) and rebase > >the master > >2) we merge the external release branch locally and just push the result > >as i did with the master at [1] > >3) we don't allow pushes (in the future) before we pushed the fast > >forwarded master. > > > >regards, > >gerhard > > > >[1] https://github.com/os890/DS_Discuss > > > > > > >
