+1, but it should be an own module and not part or core, right? LieGrue, strub
----- Original Message ----- > From: Christian Kaltepoth <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Cc: > Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2012 7:11 AM > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Adding Solder Exception Handling aka Seam Catch to > DeltaSpike v0.2-incubating > > +1 > > 2012/2/27 Pete Muir <[email protected]>: >> +1 to basic idea and concept. >> >> On 24 Feb 2012, at 17:55, Jason Porter wrote: >> >>> fyi: please check [1] before you answer. >>> >>> [2] and [2a] contain the current Solder implementatation >>> >>> the basic concept: >>> Slight modifications and a bug fix or two from what is there currently, >>> otherwise a straight code drop (with changes obviously for packages). >>> >>> please send >>> +1, +0 or -1 because... >>> for the basic idea as well as the basic concept. >>> if there are >basic< objections, please also add them to [3] >>> >>> regards, >>> gerhard >>> >>> [1] http://markmail.org/message/7yefspfuvtz4jvmp >>> [2] >>> > https://github.com/seam/solder/tree/develop/api/src/main/java/org/jboss/solder/exception >>> [2a] >>> > https://github.com/seam/solder/tree/develop/impl/src/main/java/org/jboss/solder/exception >>> [3] >>> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/DeltaSpike/SE+Feature+Ranking >>> >>> -- >>> Jason Porter >>> http://lightguard-jp.blogspot.com >>> http://twitter.com/lightguardjp >>> >>> Software Engineer >>> Open Source Advocate >>> Author of Seam Catch - Next Generation Java Exception Handling >>> >>> PGP key id: 926CCFF5 >>> PGP key available at: keyserver.net, pgp.mit.edu >> > > > > -- > Christian Kaltepoth > Blog: http://chkal.blogspot.com/ > Twitter: http://twitter.com/chkal >
