I thought about posting comments on the commit, but this is probably more
visible to the whole group. If we're going to call it a credential and go
with the more common security names, shouldn't it be called a Principal
then the authentication information would be the Credential? If we don't
want to go down that way I understand.

On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 15:26, Bruno Oliveira <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi folks.
>
> I was just trying to figure out a flexible way to use DS authentication
> module and did some refactoring into User and Credential stuff. Just some
> suggestions:
>
> 1- User class renaming to CredentialAuthInfo, because User has a little
> bit of ambiguity,
> 2- We can't guarantee that User will always have id, for this reason only
> username/password should be enough, allowing users to decorate your classes
> with another authentication methods like OAuth
> 3- LoginCredential should receive an object instead
> of straight username/password
>
> These are just suggestions and I would like to pick some jira or create
> the new one about it.
>
>
> https://github.com/abstractj/incubator-deltaspike/commit/0757366a7b129a053f34a3e0db426b48c73767be
>
> What do you think?
>
> --
>
> --
> "Know the rules well, so you can break them effectively" - Dalai Lama XIV
> -
> @abstractj
> -
> Volenti Nihil Difficile
>



-- 
Jason Porter
http://lightguard-jp.blogspot.com
http://twitter.com/lightguardjp

Software Engineer
Open Source Advocate
Author of Seam Catch - Next Generation Java Exception Handling

PGP key id: 926CCFF5
PGP key available at: keyserver.net, pgp.mit.edu

Reply via email to