I have not seen those dynamic stereotypes in free nature yet.
Actually I'm not using Stereotypes that much at all. Mainly because their usage
is limited by the Java Annotation boundaries.
Imagine the following Stereotype for my Services (I spare out the standard
stuff)
@StereoType
@Secured
@Transactional
@ApplicationScoped
public @interface @Service {}
The problem here is that there is no way to 'propagate' any rolesAllowed from
@Service to @Secured, etc.
What I'd like to have is something like
...
public @interface @Service {
String[] rolesAllowed();
TransactionAttributeType transactionType();
}
where the rolesAllowed() would get propagated to the @Secured meta-annotation
and transactionType() to the @Transactional
With such an annotation I could use:
@Service(rolesAllowed={"admin", "editor"}, transactionType = REQUIRES_NEW)
public String doSomething() {...
But that's not possible with Java Annotations. Or do you have any ideas how to
do that? (without having to manually propagate this in each and every
interceptor).
LieGrue,
strub
----- Original Message -----
> From: Pete Muir <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]; [email protected]; David
> Blevins <[email protected]>
> Cc:
> Sent: Wednesday, May 2, 2012 1:05 PM
> Subject: [cdi-dev] Dynamic stereotypes
>
> Hi all
>
> The Java EE spec leads would like feedback on how often stereotypes are
> "dynamic" vs "static".
>
> A static stereotype is one that is defined in Java code, compiled, and then
> deployed without modification from a container extension.
>
> A dynamic stereotype is one that defined in Java code, compiled, and then
> modified by an extension.
>
> Another way of putting it is:
>
> * Are there any extensions which modify stereotypes?
> * Is this something that is common or not?
>
> This relates to David's metatype proposal.
>
> Pete
> _______________________________________________
> cdi-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
>
