On 27 Jun 2012, at 05:43, Thomas Hug wrote: > @Mark, +1 on not being excessive on the amount of modules. As a user I don't > think I'd like maintaining another x dependencies, those POMs are usually big > enough :-) Anyway, depending on the amount of features integrating for such a > query API, that might well fall into the "decent size" category.
Agreed, I think the main thing to do is be flexible here. If a module starts to look unwieldy we can split it in two. > > @Pete, +1 for the ServiceHandler - IMO very convenient when using methods > just as metadata (e.g. for calling stored procs, obviously JPA queries or a > JAX-RS client). > > @Jason, Bernard: Agree that I have rarely used the Home API in a productive > application, still I found it quite handy for prototyping. Could be useful to > add this on top of a query API (and create e.g. a Forge scaffolding > provider?). > > Cheers, > Tom > > -----Original Message----- > From: Mark Struberg [mailto:strub...@yahoo.de] > Sent: Dienstag, 26. Juni 2012 07:58 > To: deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: cdi-query > > I fear that would get us into jarmageddon... > > We discussed the module structure at the very beginning, and we all concluded > that there are 2 reasons for introducing a new module: > .) a dependency to another project or EE api (like jta, jpa, jsf) > .) an area which is an completely own block and has a decent size (min > ~30..50 new classes) > > Since the whole JPA area doesn't have more than 10 classes yet, I do not see > a reason for introducing a new API for them. > > Also the whole EE vs SE is moot imo. Either we have a new API or not. The > classic J2EE patterns are dead dead dead anyway. EE-6 gave us much better > possibilities, so we should use them and not fall back to _old_ EE patterns. > > What we could do is to disucss whether the 'jta' module would better called > 'deltaspike-jpa-ee' and not only contain JTA but also > TransactionAttributeType handling from EJB? > > > LieGrue, > strub > > > > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> >> To: deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org >> Cc: >> Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2012 12:30 AM >> Subject: Re: cdi-query >> >> +1 >> >> - Romain >> >> >> 2012/6/26 Gerhard Petracek <gerhard.petra...@gmail.com> >> >>> @ pete: >>> +1 >>> >>> @ java-se vs java-ee features: >>> >>> we can think about a more fine-grained structure (similar to seam3). >>> e.g.: >>> deltaspike-jpa-transaction >>> deltaspike-jpa-query >>> ... >>> >>> regards, >>> gerhard >>> >>> >>> >>> 2012/6/25 Pete Muir <pm...@redhat.com> >>> >>>> Well, we were looking for some good use cases for the ServiceHandler. >>>> >>>> I would be in support of adding it to DS core, now we have a >>> strong >> use >>>> case. >>>> >>>> Property util should not be controversial. Maybe we can improve >> it's API >>>> whilst we are at it :-) >>>> >>>> On 25 Jun 2012, at 10:25, Thomas Hug wrote: >>>> >>>>> Eventually this came in a little early, but it's already on >> the radar: >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-60 >>>>> >>>>> The current implementation mainly depends on the Solder >> ServiceHandler >>>> (as far as I remember not yet in DS, waiting for CDI 1.1) and the >>> Property > utils. >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> Tom >>>>> >>>>> ________________________________________ >>>>> Von: Mark Struberg [strub...@yahoo.de] > > Gesendet: Montag, >>> 25. Juni 2012 14:21 > > An: deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org >>>>> Betreff: Re: cdi-query >>>>> >>>>> +1 great stuff to review and add them! >>>>> >>>>> That would fit great into the deltaspike-jpa module, wdyt? >>>>> >>>>> LieGrue, >>>>> strub >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>>>> From: Pete Muir <pm...@redhat.com> > >> To: >>> deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org >>>>>> Cc: >>>>>> Sent: Monday, June 25, 2012 1:53 PM > >> Subject: Re: >>> cdi-query > >> > >> IMO this would be a great thing to add! >>>>>> >>>>>> On 24 Jun 2012, at 16:56, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> just browsed >>>> http://ctpconsulting.github.com/query/1.0.0.Alpha4/index.html >>>>>> and >>>>>>> it is really amazing (a spring-data CDI oriented). >>>>>>> >>>>>>> it is currently based on solder but since DS integrates a >> lot of this >>>> stuff >>>>>>> i wonder if it could be integrated in DS in a really >> portable way? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> - Romain >>>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>
