if there are no objections, i'll import the annotations tomorrow. -> we can change the names later on (as soon as we have an agreement).
regards, gerhard 2012/10/17 Jason Porter <[email protected]> > I honestly don't have a preference for the names. > > +1 for @BeforePhase / @AfterPhase > > On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 12:38 PM, Brian Leathem <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > On Wed 17 Oct 2012 11:17:46 AM PDT, Brian Leathem wrote: > > > >> can we not build on the @ListenerFor annotation in JSF [1]? > >> > >> @ListenerFor(phaseEventClass=.**..) > >> > >> or, if we need a unique name, perhaps: > >> > >> @ListenerForPhase(**phaseEventClass=...) > >> > > > > As Gerhard pointed out in IRC, this would just be a marker annotation, > and > > hence empty: > > @ListenerForPhase() > > > > Brian > > > > > > > -- > Jason Porter > http://lightguard-jp.blogspot.com > http://twitter.com/lightguardjp > > Software Engineer > Open Source Advocate > > PGP key id: 926CCFF5 > PGP key available at: keyserver.net, pgp.mit.edu >
