This is a very nice feature to add IMO :-) We have done something very similar as an example for JBoss as well.
Looks like this modelled after the abandoned JSR-255 annotations? On 28 Nov 2012, at 21:49, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > yep > > from a dependency point of view it can be in core i think (and > annotations in api) > > can be a separated module too but think it is not justified > > the issue i currently have is how to get the cdi bean from the MBean. > I used BeanProvider (ignoring Qualifiers for a first version) but it > is not the best way if some "destroy/release" should be done. Not sure > we have this issue elsewhere > > What i wanted to avoid is to add a MBean specific qualifier and add > another bean completely managed (to use later @Inject @DSMBean MyMBean > mbean;) > > Romain Manni-Bucau > Twitter: @rmannibucau > Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ > LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau > Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau > > > > 2012/11/28 Mark Struberg <[email protected]>: >> yea, looks good. Not sure in which module it fits though. But certainly a >> good start for a discussion. >> >> LieGrue, >> strub >> >> >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> >>> To: [email protected] >>> Cc: >>> Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2012 8:58 PM >>> Subject: MBeans extension? >>> >>> Hi guys, >>> >>> just pushed on guithub a poc to ease MBean (JMX ones) usage with CDI. >>> >>> Here are the sources: https://github.com/rmannibucau/cdi-mbean >>> >>> do you think we can/should integrate it in DS? >>> >>> Romain Manni-Bucau >>> Twitter: @rmannibucau >>> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ >>> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau >>> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau >>>
