Done.
Nice remember of "vi" commands Pete :-)

2013/3/27 Pete Muir <pm...@redhat.com>:
> Err, s/CI/CDI/ :-)
>
> On 27 Mar 2013, at 14:10, Pete Muir <pm...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> This is really at CI level, not the DS level. What you propose is an option, 
>> I suggest you comment on CDI-129.
>>
>> On 27 Mar 2013, at 13:05, titou10 titou10 <titou10.tito...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Could this be a configurable thing?
>>> by default it is EAR wide, but you can configure it with a DS property
>>> to be WAR wide ?
>>>
>>> 2013/3/27 Peter Muir (JIRA) <j...@apache.org>:
>>>>
>>>>   [ 
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-335?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13615168#comment-13615168
>>>>  ]
>>>>
>>>> Peter Muir commented on DELTASPIKE-335:
>>>> ---------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> Regarding CDI-129, there was a majority in favour of @ApplicationScoped 
>>>> being EAR wide, however we did not manage to fully address the issue in 
>>>> time, so it has been deferred to CDI.next. I would expect the resolution 
>>>> to be EAR-wide then, though, and plan for that in DeltaSpike.
>>>>
>>>>> re-visit support of EARs
>>>>> ------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>>               Key: DELTASPIKE-335
>>>>>               URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-335
>>>>>           Project: DeltaSpike
>>>>>        Issue Type: Task
>>>>>  Affects Versions: 0.4-incubating
>>>>>          Reporter: Gerhard Petracek
>>>>>           Fix For: 0.5-incubating
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> #1
>>>>> our current approach to get rid of basic classloader issues (esp. with 
>>>>> EARs) is to collect information during bootstrapping and inject the 
>>>>> extension instance to consume the result later on. that can expose the 
>>>>> collected information of one web-app to other web-apps (of the same EAR). 
>>>>> in codi we used the classloader as key, however, this approach also has 
>>>>> disadvantages.
>>>>> (something like @WebApplicationName would only work in some cases.)
>>>>> #2
>>>>> there was no real agreement about https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-129.
>>>>> currently we expect that @ApplicationScoped is separated per web-app.
>>>>> however, that's at least not the case with current versions of weld.
>>>>> -> (at least for current versions of weld) we have to think about an own 
>>>>> @WebApplicationScoped
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
>>>> If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA 
>>>> administrators
>>>> For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
>>
>

Reply via email to