hi arne, there are add-ons for it. primarily extval provides the infrastructure you need to implement such advanced features (which are even compatible with jsf 1.x).
regards, gerhard 2013/3/28 Arne Limburg <arne.limb...@openknowledge.de> > Hi Rudy, > > > Yes, I know EXTVAL :-) > However I don't like that I have to annotate one field to reference > another. My feeling is, that, when I am able to annotate a method with x > parameters, the stuff is all together and I can see all values that I need > for my validation. > Probably my feature should go into EXTVAL instead into DeltaSpike ;-) > > Cheers, > Arne > > BTW: Is it possible in EXTVAL to specify cross-field validation with more > than two fields? > > > Am 28.03.13 10:39 schrieb "Rudy De Busscher" unter <rdebussc...@gmail.com > >: > > >@method validation > > > >As I used the Extval features for these kind of situations and wrote > >extensions for it to enhance the crossfield validation (like your example > >of the password, see also [1] ) > >I'm very interested to have this in DeltaSpike/help with such a feature > >(if > >you need it) in DeltaSpike > > > >regards > >Rudy > > > >[1] = > > > http://jsfcorner.blogspot.be/2011/09/cross-field-validation-with-jsf-and.h > >tml > > > >On 28 March 2013 10:31, Arne Limburg <arne.limb...@openknowledge.de> > >wrote: > > > >> Imho when we think about JSF validation we don't need to mimic existing > >> features of JSF 2, but we have to see where features are missing. > >> > >> I.e. BVAL 1.1 will contain method-validation, but JSF completely missed > >>to > >> integrate it. This is where we should fill the gap. > >> > >> I am thinking about something like > >> > >> <h:form> > >> <f:validateMethod value="#{myBean.updatePassword(myBean.password, > >> myBean.repeatedPassword)}" /> > >> <h:inputSecret value="#{myBean.password}" /> > >> <h:inputSecret value="#{myBean.repeatedPassword}" /> > >> </h:form> > >> > >> where updatePassword is validated in the PROCESS_VALIDATION phase (with > >> the local values of both fields) and ideally instead of calling > >> MyBean.setPassword and MyBean.setRepeatedPassword in the UPDATE_MODEL > >> phase it should call MyBean.updatePasswordŠ > >> > >> Such feature would improve cross-field validation enormously. > >> > >> WDYT? > >> > >> Regards, > >> Arne > >> > >> P.S.: I just prototyped the feature and it basically worked also I am > >>not > >> sure about the design (in my prototype f:validateMethod is a JSF > >> Component...) > >> > >> Am 25.03.13 22:20 schrieb "Mark Struberg" unter <strub...@yahoo.de>: > >> > >> >with JSF-2 this is now almost obsolete, isn't? > >> >JSF-2 has <f:validateBean> which works perfectly fine. > >> > > >> >LieGrue, > >> >strub > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> >----- Original Message ----- > >> >> From: Thomas Andraschko <andraschko.tho...@gmail.com> > >> >> To: deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org > >> >> Cc: > >> >> Sent: Monday, March 25, 2013 5:31 PM > >> >> Subject: Re: DeltaSpike Roadmap > >> >> > >> >> Are you sure? PrimeFaces does not have one. I only know richfaces' > >> >> graphValidator and it's IMO not that easy and cool as s:validateForm. > >> >> > >> >> 2013/3/25 John D. Ament <john.d.am...@gmail.com> > >> >> > >> >>> I believe all of the major JSF component libraries support some > >>type > >> >>>of > >> >>> form validation using BV. > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Thomas Andraschko < > >> >>> andraschko.tho...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >>> > >> >>> > Any news about s:validateForm? > >> >>> > As i said, it's great feature of seam3 and would perfectly fit DS > >> >> (IMO). > >> >>> > > >> >>> > I could also add it to DS if no one have enough time... :) > >> >>> > > >> >>> > 2012/12/17 Gerhard Petracek <gerhard.petra...@gmail.com> > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > there is a reason why it is just an add-on ;) > >> >>> > > and yes, if you would do it with the jsf2-api, it would be a > >>bit > >> >>> easier. > >> >>> > > but you can use this add-on also for jsf 1.x and some users who > >> >> don't > >> >>> > like > >> >>> > > to use seam are happy with it. > >> >>> > > however, i just mentioned it as an example to show that cdi > >> >> isn't > >> >>> needed > >> >>> > to > >> >>> > > implement such a functionality. > >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > regards, > >> >>> > > gerhard > >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > 2012/12/17 Lincoln Baxter, III <lincolnbax...@gmail.com> > >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > > Also, note that the use-cases for <s:validateForm> and > >> >> the latter > >> >>> > example > >> >>> > > > are different in their usage. IMO, <s:validateForm> is > >> >> much more > >> >>> > > > declarative and simple than the example provided from > >> >> extval. > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > Just write a validator and attach it like you would normal > >> >> to a > >> >>> > component > >> >>> > > > in the view, wherever you want to use it. You can also > >> >> re-use > >> >>> > > > form-validators using this method, instead of using some (in > >> >> my > >> >>> > opinion) > >> >>> > > > strange view-filtering logic in the FormValidator > >> >> annotation. > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > <s:validateForm> is/was one of the most well recieved > >> >> feature of Seam > >> >>> > > > Faces, and I think it deserves serious consideration. Can > >> >> you do form > >> >>> > > > validation other ways? absolutely, but this way is pretty > >> >> compelling > >> >>> > > based > >> >>> > > > on the feedback we got. It also ties in very normally with > >> >> the way in > >> >>> > > which > >> >>> > > > JSF handles validation and components, which is not > >> >> something that I > >> >>> > can > >> >>> > > > speak about with regard to extval, but I can say that seam > >> >> faces does > >> >>> > > this > >> >>> > > > nicely. > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > ~Lincoln > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 4:37 PM, Thomas Andraschko < > >> >>> > > > andraschko.tho...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > > Please do not mix both :) > >> >>> > > > > We had the discussion about commons bv constrains. > >> >> s:validateForm > >> >>> is > >> >>> > > > > completely different compared to bv constraints. > >> >>> > > > > s:validateForm does not fit the project for common bv > >> >> constraints. > >> >>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > 2012/12/17 Karl Kildén <karl.kil...@gmail.com> > >> >>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > Looks really nice I understand finally :-) > >> >>> > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > In retrospect I don't know why I didn't > >> >> check the docs myself, > >> >>> > > probably > >> >>> > > > > > because I read most of the discussion on the phone > >> >> to begin with. > >> >>> > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > I then agree with the many suggestions regarding > >> >> doing it as a > >> >>> > > parallel > >> >>> > > > > > project. Perhaps that module could have a sub > >> >> module for CDI > >> >>> users > >> >>> > > > that > >> >>> > > > > > included producers and such. > >> >>> > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > Best regards / Karl > >> >>> > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > 2012/12/17 Gerhard Petracek > >> >> <gerhard.petra...@gmail.com> > >> >>> > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > hi karl, > >> >>> > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > it's implemented via a producer - see > >> >> [1]. > >> >>> > > > > > > but you don't really need cdi for it - > >> >> see e.g. [2]. > >> >>> > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > regards, > >> >>> > > > > > > gerhard > >> >>> > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > [1] http://s.apache.org/ury > >> >>> > > > > > > [2] > >> >>> > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > >> >> > >> > >>>> > http://os890.blogspot.co.at/2010/06/multi-field-form-validation-with-js > >>>>r > >> . > >> >>html > >> >>> > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > 2012/12/17 Thomas Andraschko > >> >> <andraschko.tho...@gmail.com> > >> >>> > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > As far as i understand, validateAll just > >> >> validates all > >> >>> > components > >> >>> > > > but > >> >>> > > > > > you > >> >>> > > > > > > > can't use custom logic. > >> >>> > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > Checkout the seam docu here: > >> >>> > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > >> >> > >> >> > >> > >> > http://docs.jboss.org/seam/3/faces/latest/reference/en-US/html/components > >> >>.html > >> >>> > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > 2012/12/17 Karl Kildén > >> >> <karl.kil...@gmail.com> > >> >>> > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > Hrmm still not sure I understand. > >> >> First off didn't Pete > >> >>> just > >> >>> > > say > >> >>> > > > it > >> >>> > > > > > was > >> >>> > > > > > > > > just a JSF-validator? It also > >> >> sounds and reads just like > >> >>> > > > > validateAll > >> >>> > > > > > > from > >> >>> > > > > > > > > omnifaces? > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > What is lacking that you would like > >> >> to see solved by CDI? > >> >>> And > >> >>> > > is > >> >>> > > > > it a > >> >>> > > > > > > > > natural fit for CDI extensions > >> >> rather then BV / JSF > >> >>> > extensions? > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > Best regards / Karl > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > 2012/12/17 Thomas Andraschko > >> >> <andraschko.tho...@gmail.com> > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > Hi, > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > they are nice but i can't > >> >> see a replacement for > >> >>> > > s:validateForm. > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > IMO s:validateForm is really a > >> >> simple solution for > >> >>> > > cross-field > >> >>> > > > > > > > > validation, > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > which is CDI based. > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > Regards, > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > THomas > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > 2012/12/17 Karl Kildén > >> >> <karl.kil...@gmail.com> > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > Well these are the > >> >> validators from omnifaces as per my > >> >>> > > > previous > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > recommendation: > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > - > >> >> RequiredCheckboxValidator< > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > >> >> > >> >> > >> > >> > https://showcase-omnifaces.rhcloud.com/showcase/validators/RequiredCheckb > >> >>oxValidator.xhtml > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > - validateAll< > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > >> >> > >> >> > >> > >> > https://showcase-omnifaces.rhcloud.com/showcase/validators/validateAll.xh > >> >>tml > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > - > >> >> validateAllOrNone< > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > >> >> > >> >> > >> > >> > https://showcase-omnifaces.rhcloud.com/showcase/validators/validateAllOrN > >> >>one.xhtml > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > - validateEqual< > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > >> >> > >> > >>>> > https://showcase-omnifaces.rhcloud.com/showcase/validators/validateEqua > >>>>l > >> . > >> >>xhtml > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > - validateOne< > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > >> >> > >> >> > >> > >> > https://showcase-omnifaces.rhcloud.com/showcase/validators/validateOne.xh > >> >>tml > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > - > >> >> validateOneOrMore< > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > >> >> > >> >> > >> > >> > https://showcase-omnifaces.rhcloud.com/showcase/validators/validateOneOrM > >> >>ore.xhtml > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > - > >> >> validateOneOrNone< > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > >> >> > >> >> > >> > >> > https://showcase-omnifaces.rhcloud.com/showcase/validators/validateOneOrN > >> >>one.xhtml > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > - validateOrder< > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > >> >> > >> > >>>> > https://showcase-omnifaces.rhcloud.com/showcase/validators/validateOrde > >>>>r > >> . > >> >>xhtml > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > - validateUnique > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > < > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > >> >> > >> >> > >> > >> > https://showcase-omnifaces.rhcloud.com/showcase/validators/validateUnique > >> >>.xhtml > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > >Best > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > regards / Karl > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > 2012/12/17 Thomas > >> >> Andraschko < > >> >>> > andraschko.tho...@gmail.com> > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > PrimeFaces > >> >> doesn't have such a component/utility. > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > Also AFAICS it's > >> >> based on CDI, so IMO DeltaSpike is a > >> >>> > > good > >> >>> > > > > > place > >> >>> > > > > > > > for > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > it. > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > 2012/12/17 Jason > >> >> Porter <lightguard...@gmail.com> > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 17, > >> >> 2012 at 4:54 AM, Pete Muir < > >> >>> > > > > pm...@redhat.com > >> >>> > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > wrote: > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 17 Dec > >> >> 2012, at 08:55, Gerhard Petracek wrote: > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > hi > >> >> karl, > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > #1 > >> >> apache myfaces (extval) doesn't implement > >> >>> jsr > >> >>> > > 303 > >> >>> > > > > > (e.g. > >> >>> > > > > > > > > apache > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > bval > >> >> implements it) > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > #2 > >> >> there is no agreement that ds is only > >> >>> backend > >> >>> > > > > oriented > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >> regards, > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >> gerhard > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >> 2012/12/17 Karl Kildén <karl.kil...@gmail.com> > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> >> Hi Thomas, fellow user here. > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> >> BV is as you may know specified in JSR-303. It > >> >>> > has > >> >>> > > > > great > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >> implementations by > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> >> myfaces and hibernate that you can find > >> >>> easily. > >> >>> > > Thus > >> >>> > > > > > this > >> >>> > > > > > > > will > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > not > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > be > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> >> implemented in deltaspike afaik. However > >> >>> > providing > >> >>> > > > > some > >> >>> > > > > > > > common > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >> constraints > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> >> beyond the specification sounds like a good > >> >>> > idea. > >> >>> > > > Note > >> >>> > > > > > > that > >> >>> > > > > > > > in > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > the > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > mean > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> >> while @Email is almost trivial to implement > >> >>> > > yourself > >> >>> > > > > if > >> >>> > > > > > > you > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > search > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > it > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > a > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> >> little. JSR-303 is highly extensible just like > >> >>> > > CDI. > >> >>> > > > > The > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > implementation > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > you > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> >> choose might have it as an extra already. > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> >> For frontend extras I can't say I see an > >> >>> obvious > >> >>> > > > home > >> >>> > > > > in > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > deltaspike > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> >> (someone correct me if I am wrong about this). > >> >>> > > But I > >> >>> > > > > > think > >> >>> > > > > > > > for > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > now > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> >> Deltaspike is more backend oriented. I > >> >>> recommend > >> >>> > > > > having > >> >>> > > > > > a > >> >>> > > > > > > > look > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > at > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > omnifaces > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> >> that already provide several great custom > >> >>> > > > > jsf-validators > >> >>> > > > > > > and > >> >>> > > > > > > > > has > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > an > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > open > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> >> request for users to ask for additional ones. > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> >> best regards / Karl > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> >> 2012/12/16 Thomas Andraschko < > >> >>> > > > > > andraschko.tho...@gmail.com > >> >>> > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >>>>> Hi, > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >>>>> > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >>>>> is there a roadmap available for all upcoming > >> >>> > > > > features? > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >>>>> > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >>>>> Will there also be a BV module in the future? > >> >>> > > Will > >> >>> > > > it > >> >>> > > > > > > also > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > include > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > some > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >>>>> commons constraints like Email? > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hmm, I > >> >> think this could be a good thing for a > >> >>> > > parallel > >> >>> > > > > > > project > >> >>> > > > > > > > to > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > DeltaSpike > >> >> actually - a library of BV constraints > >> >>> > not > >> >>> > > > > > branded > >> >>> > > > > > > > by > >> >>> > > > > > > > > a > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > specific > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > impl. > >> >> I've cc'd Emmanuel, spec lead for BV, to > >> >>> see > >> >>> > if > >> >>> > > > he > >> >>> > > > > > has > >> >>> > > > > > > > any > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > plans > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > for > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > such a > >> >> thing. > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >>>>> > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >>>>> What about the Seam s:validateForm? IMO it's > >> >>> a > >> >>> > > > simple > >> >>> > > > > > way > >> >>> > > > > > > > for > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > cross > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > field > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >>>>> validation. Will this be added in future > >> >>> > > releases? > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is > >> >> not actually a BV validator, but a JSF > >> >>> > > > > validator. I > >> >>> > > > > > > > know > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > Mark > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > is > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > working on > >> >> JSF stuff for DeltaSpike atm, perhaps > >> >>> > this > >> >>> > > > is > >> >>> > > > > > > > > something > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > Jason > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > could add > >> >> to that. > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > Is this > >> >> something that belongs in DeltaSpike, or > >> >>> > should > >> >>> > > > it > >> >>> > > > > be > >> >>> > > > > > > in > >> >>> > > > > > > > a > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > JSF > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > component > >> >> library? I know RichFaces has something > >> >>> > very > >> >>> > > > > > > similar, I > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > believe > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > PrimeFaces does > >> >> as well (haven't looked for a > >> >>> while) > >> >>> > > and > >> >>> > > > I > >> >>> > > > > > have > >> >>> > > > > > > > no > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > idea > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > about other > >> >> component libraries. > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >>>>> > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >>>>> How can i contribue to DeltaSpike? I could do > >> >>> > > some > >> >>> > > > > > > smaller > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > tasks > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > without > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >>>>> problems. > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >>>>> I also implemented constraints like > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > >> >> EqualsExpression("#{...}"). > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > Maybe > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> >> this > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >>>>> could be useful for other users, too. > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > This page > >> >> should help - > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > >> >> http://deltaspike.staging.apache.org/deltaspike/community.html > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >>>>> > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >>>>> Best regards, > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >>>>> Thomas > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >>>>> > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > Jason Porter > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >> http://lightguard-jp.blogspot.com > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >> http://twitter.com/lightguardjp > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > Software > >> >> Engineer > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > Open Source > >> >> Advocate > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > PGP key id: > >> >> 926CCFF5 > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > PGP key > >> >> available at: keyserver.net, pgp.mit.edu > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > -- > >> >>> > > > Lincoln Baxter, III > >> >>> > > > http://ocpsoft.org > >> >>> > > > "Simpler is better." > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > >> >> > >> > >> > >
