+1 for such a roadmap Especially because this will help users to get an idea of where the project is going and when we expect certain features to be available.
Christian 2013/4/7 Cody Lerum <cody.le...@gmail.com> > I'm in favor of this at least until we have a 1.0 release. > > The dates should be thought of as goals rather than deadlines since this is > all volunteer. > > This would also give the project a more defined roadmap for users to > follow. > > > On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 11:59 AM, Jason Porter <lightguard...@gmail.com > >wrote: > > > Perhaps we should look at a time boxed idea (I think it's been brought up > > before, worth discussing again I think). I understand we may not have > > anything to release during a time slot, so we could not do one in those > > slots, but maybe a month or three week time boxed set of releases would > be > > good. Thoughts? > > > > -- > > Jason Porter > > http://en.gravatar.com/lightguardjp > > > -- Christian Kaltepoth Blog: http://blog.kaltepoth.de/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/chkal GitHub: https://github.com/chkal
