Yep, like this way to go. Much more efficient.

JLouis


2013/4/11 Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de>

> +1 for hangouts. Much easier and quicker.
> Of course only to identify options and discuss opportunities. All info
> must get summed up to the mailing list afterwards.
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <jeano...@gmail.com>
> > To: deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > Cc:
> > Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2013 8:18 AM
> > Subject: Re: Weekly or biweekly IRC meeting
> >
> > Using Google Hangouts is also another way to go.
> >
> > Jean-Louis
> >
> >
> > 2013/4/11 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>
> >
> >>  If thats 1h +1
> >>  Le 11 avr. 2013 01:04, "Jason Porter"
> > <lightguard...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> >>
> >>  > It'll still be an issue, someone is going to be waking up really
> > early or
> >>  > staying up late for it. Though perhaps something like a 12:00 or
> 13:00
> >>  UTC
> >>  > may work if I recall most people's time zones.
> >>  >
> >>  >
> >>  > On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 4:55 PM, John D. Ament
> > <john.d.am...@gmail.com
> >>  > >wrote:
> >>  >
> >>  > > It would be good for identifying who's got what on their
> > plates and how
> >>  > to
> >>  > > get moving forward.  I recall for Seam 3 the biggest issue was
> > time of
> >>  > day
> >>  > > for the meeting.
> >>  > >
> >>  > >
> >>  > > On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 6:25 PM, Cody Lerum
> > <cody.le...@gmail.com>
> >>  > wrote:
> >>  > >
> >>  > > > Would anyone else be in favor of having a weekly or biweekly
> > IRC
> >>  > meeting
> >>  > > > where the we can discuss status of the project as well as
> > interact
> >>  with
> >>  > > the
> >>  > > > users?
> >>  > > >
> >>  > > > We could keep a transcript which would would be posted to
> > the list,
> >>  and
> >>  > > > require all decisions happen on the list.
> >>  > > >
> >>  > > > Thoughts?
> >>  > > >
> >>  > > > -C
> >>  > > >
> >>  > >
> >>  >
> >>  >
> >>  >
> >>  > --
> >>  > Jason Porter
> >>  > http://en.gravatar.com/lightguardjp
> >>  >
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Jean-Louis
> >
>



-- 
Jean-Louis

Reply via email to