IMO it should apply to superclasses as well. On 16 Oct 2012, at 14:02, Dirk Weil wrote:
> Hi everybody, > > > > I started a discussion at https://community.jboss.org/message/764873#764873 > about the seam transaction interceptor, which is not handling derived > methods (see original post further down). Jason Porter pointed me to this > mail list, stating that DeltaSpikes Transactional Interceptor behaves in the > same way. What are the reasons for this? Isn't it normally the case that a > user wants transactional behavior regardless of where the method is defined > (base class or derived class)? > > Additionally I regard it dangerous if an interceptor does not behave like an > ordinal interceptor (I know: Transactional intercepts every call, but it > does different things depending on the class defining the method > intercepted). > > > > Please give me some hint, why the implementation of Transactional was done > in that way. > > > > Thank you very much and best regards > > Dirk Weil >
