Nils, I said that there was *no way* that the built in d-ChangeX would be looking at the directives and thinking, "hmm this is setting the duration I should change that". Which is true enough. But ... The set duration in ticks command does not, of course, create a directive, and so it was possible to make the change of duration look at the duration and decide to delete the chord directives that modify the duration of the chord. These are those that do not have OVERRIDE_AFFIX set. And this is what I did. (And forgot that I had done something so cunning of course:). Unfortunately when you applied \neohead you also changed the \breve to being in the postfix field, which is not being looked for. The prefix field comes before the duration and the postfix after it - as the duration is being overriden (because of the duration in ticks being set) this makes no difference in this case - in general the postfix field on a chord is for something coming after the duration (again, if AFFIX were set, it could mean yet something else, but nothing has been defined for that case). Anyway, I have moved the \breve etc back into the prefix field and change duration is now working again. I should also check for the AFFIX flag in the code, since directives with that set are not associated with the duration, they are prefixing the entire chord < >n. It is working at the moment because the relevant directive comes first.
One thing though is that neohead is *not* deleted when you change the duration, and I notice that LilyPond responds with some other sort of head. This really is because you have associated the graphic with the wrong directive, it should be on the neohead directive, I think. But of course it won't change just because you change the duration; for that you need to replace d-ChangeN with a scripted version. Richard _______________________________________________ Denemo-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel
