On Sun, 24 Jul 2011 20:10:03 +0100, Richard Shann wrote > On Sun, 2011-07-24 at 20:10 +0200, R. Mattes wrote: > > > > BTW, would it be possible to merge my load-path branch into main? > > I'd love to use it for the midi input stuff (and that would then > > contain > > code that does keyword lookup ... ;-) > > Sounds good to me. I can do the merge, but I am not too clear (after > reading the README.feature-guile-loadpath file) on what to look > for.
Not much. > I think I understand that with it you could write modules and > put them in $(DATADIR)/modules and they would be picked up? Yes, that's pretty much all it does. Investment into the future. > Is there > code to install this directory if it were created in git - I didn't > spot it. No. I wanted to wait until I have some stuff to put there. But the directory doesn't need to exist. > Perhaps Nils can comment - I notice he created a denemo-modules > directory, but this bit of code > > (define (use-denemo string) > ;(use-modules (actions denemo-modules (string->symbol string)))) ; > maybe not (string->symbol) but (eval) > (load (string-append "denemo-modules/" string ".scm"))) But use-modules is a macro! That code does not what Nils probably wants to do. It would be possible to write a macro to do this ... but not now. > at the start of denemo.scm implies that he turned back from using scheme > modules (in fact IIRC he mentioned something about that on #denemo). > > Richard That's the problem with split communication: I post in the news list, get responses on the mailing list (that never show up in the news archives) and Nils' comments on/problems with modules disapear in the void of IRC. Cheers, RalfD -- R. Mattes - Hochschule fuer Musik Freiburg [email protected] _______________________________________________ Denemo-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel
