Indeed people who have their own command file may want to keep them working.
There is many solutions:
 - Keep support for old style files in the code, but that's not my favorite
 - Tell people to update their files, and possibly give theme a script to
do that


2013/5/9 Richard Shann <[email protected]>

> On Thu, 2013-05-09 at 14:42 +0200, Éloi Rivard wrote:
> >
> > I made some tests with intltools, this is great.
> >
> > It works very well when you add your xml files to po/POTFILES.in
> >
> > The only cost is to suffix every xml files with ".xml", and prefix
> > translatable xml tags with an underscore: <tooltip> becames <_tooltip>
> >
> > Of course we can keep compatibility with current files (no file name
> > suffix, no tag prefix).
> > Is it acceptable ?
>
> This sounds very good. I don't understand whether you mean we will or
> will not need a name change for the current command files and/or the
> current tags. It seems we will need to change them if we want them
> translated, are you suggesting we continue to support old-style ones for
> the benefit of people who may have their own command files?
>
> Richard
>
>
>


-- 
Éloi Rivard - [email protected]

« On perd plus à être indécis qu'à se tromper. »
_______________________________________________
Denemo-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel

Reply via email to