On Tue, 2013-08-27 at 14:52 -0500, Jeremiah Benham wrote: > I can restart the release process. Is the fix in git? I have just pushed it to git master, it is the file actions/Default.scm that is changed
> Should I recreate the branch or just checkout the changed file? Whatever is simplest to do is fine. Richard > > Jeremiah > > On Aug 27, 2013 1:18 PM, "Richard Shann" <richard.sh...@virgin.net> > wrote: > On Tue, 2013-08-27 at 12:15 -0500, Jeremiah Benham wrote: > > I updated the version numbers and created a branch. > I downloaded the 1.0.8 tarball you created in > denemo.org/downloads and > built it as a new user. It seems fine apart from one minor > issue. The > default startup scheme script (actions/Default.scm) creates > buttons > using markup for the labels. I suspect this has gone in gtk3, > as they > are not showing properly. > I don't mind re-starting the release process (it doesn't > affect the > translations) if you are happy to, or to leave it as is. > > Richard > > > > I am going to work on building librubberband in gub now. > > > > Jeremiah > > > > On Aug 27, 2013 9:29 AM, "Richard Shann" > <richard.sh...@virgin.net> > > wrote: > > On Tue, 2013-08-27 at 08:24 -0500, Jeremiah Benham > wrote: > > > I am ready now. Gub is still relying on gtk2 and > guile 1.8 > > for the > > > binaries though. > > > > > > > That's fine, as long as I remember to check that the > binaries > > are > > working ok. Have you been able to gub the > librubberband yet? I > > haven't > > been able to build with gub since I updated to > Debian Wheezy; > > my next > > attempt in that direction will be to start from > scratch with > > your github > > but I haven't got to trying that yet - I seem to > recall it is > > quite a > > battle. The rubberband library should build under > gub ok, > > though it may > > need the .pc file patching (they wrote Cflags where > they meant > > CFlags > > and so the include file wasn't found). > > > > Richard > > > > > > > > Jeremiah > > > > > > On Aug 27, 2013 6:03 AM, "Richard Shann" > > <richard.sh...@virgin.net> > > > wrote: > > > Even though we have only recently released > 1.0.6 I > > think we > > > should > > > proceed without delay to 1.0.8 > > > One reason is because release 1.0.6 if > built with > > guile 2.0 > > > will not > > > execute many commands, Upbeat in > particular. I have > > fixed this > > > since > > > moving on to guile 2 myself. > > > The other is, of course, the transcription > from > > Audio feature. > > > > > > Please say when you are happy to push > through > > another release > > > and I will > > > update the po files in preparation. > > > > > > Richard > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Denemo-devel mailing list > > > Denemo-devel@gnu.org > > > > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel > > > > > > _______________________________________________ Denemo-devel mailing list Denemo-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel
