Great, this is pushed.
2013/11/6 Richard Shann <[email protected]> > On Wed, 2013-11-06 at 15:50 +0100, Éloi Rivard wrote: > > I will focus on the refactor branch later, as you said. > > > > The priority I think is to be able to run Denemo without a GUI so we > > can set up some tests that could be checked at each commit by Travis. > > > > What about the scm field in actions ? (My sunday message) > > There is a comment in view.c:5897 > > Note that all such actions (that may be called back by scheme > directly in this fashion) are given the attribute "scm" with value 1; I > do not think this is being exploited in the code at present, and is > perhaps not needed. > > I can't think of a situation in the code where you would have a > GtkAction and need to know if there was a corresponding scheme function > for executing the action; that is when you could use that, although you > could always ask guile. So it can go. > > Richard > > > > > > > > > > > 2013/11/6 Richard Shann <[email protected]> > > On Wed, 2013-11-06 at 14:57 +0100, Éloi Rivard wrote: > > > Yes incremental search works too. > > > > > > oh, that's very good news. I can try to test later - did you > > still need > > the branch "refactor" testing? I was unable to build that one > > when I > > tried and emailed about it... > > Richard > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2013/11/6 Richard Shann <[email protected]> > > > On Wed, 2013-11-06 at 14:38 +0100, Éloi Rivard > > wrote: > > > > If have commited some changes on the branch > > > command-hash-table. Now in > > > > DenemoKeymap commands are stored in a hashmap and > > no more in > > > a > > > > GtkListStore, and bindings are stored in a GList > > instead of > > > in a > > > > GtkListStore. This should reduce a bit the > > dependency toward > > > Gtk, so > > > > it is a first step to make denemo launch without > > Gtk. > > > > > > > > > > > > For what I have seen I seems to work. Commands are > > executed. > > > You can > > > > add and remove bindings in command manager etc. > > > > > > Can you search for them incrementally. I am very > > sorry, but I > > > meant to > > > alert you to this after a previous email which I may > > not have > > > replied to > > > yet (I haven't got a chance to test your new branch > > yet, but > > > the search > > > is part of some view widget functionality and is > > enormously > > > useful at > > > present). > > > > > > Richard > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Éloi Rivard - [email protected] > > > > > > « On perd plus à être indécis qu'à se tromper. » > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Éloi Rivard - [email protected] > > > > « On perd plus à être indécis qu'à se tromper. » > > > > > -- Éloi Rivard - [email protected] « On perd plus à être indécis qu'à se tromper. »
_______________________________________________ Denemo-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel
