Did you run ./autogen and ./configure ? Because menu.c is a file that has
been created after the 1.1.0 tag, so it is normal it does not exist when
you build it.
Branches are supposed to use to bring fixes or features, and tags are
supposed to mark releases. Git internally handle them differently. It is a
bit easier to differentiate releases and feature code when you have a lot
of branches (like me :) ).



2013/11/16 Richard Shann <[email protected]>

> I downloaded this and tried to build and it failed at the make stage:
>
> denemo-user@DebianBox:~/denemo-1.1.0$ make && make install
> make  all-recursive
> make[1]: Entering directory `/home/denemo-user/denemo-1.1.0'
> Making all in tools
> make[2]: Entering directory `/home/denemo-user/denemo-1.1.0/tools'
> gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I..     -g -O2 -pthread -I/usr/include/guile/2.0
>   -I/usr/include/libxml2   -pthread -I/usr/include/librsvg-2.0
> -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/glib-2.0/include
> -I/usr/include/gdk-pixbuf-2.0 -I/usr/include/cairo -I/usr/include/libpng12
> -I/usr/include/pixman-1 -I/usr/include/freetype2     -pthread -lgthread-2.0
> -lrt -lglib-2.0   -lsndfile   -I/usr/include/glib-2.0
> -I/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/glib-2.0/include   -pthread
> -I/usr/include/gtk-3.0 -I/usr/include/pango-1.0
> -I/usr/include/gio-unix-2.0/ -I/usr/include/atk-1.0 -I/usr/include/cairo
> -I/usr/include/gdk-pixbuf-2.0 -I/usr/include/freetype2
> -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/glib-2.0/include
> -I/usr/include/pixman-1 -I/usr/include/libpng12   -pthread
> -I/usr/include/gtksourceview-3.0 -I/usr/include/libxml2
> -I/usr/include/gtk-3.0 -I/usr/include/pango-1.0
> -I/usr/include/gio-unix-2.0/ -I/usr/include/atk-1.0 -I/usr/include/cairo
> -I/usr/include/gdk-pixbuf-2.0 -I/usr/include/freetype2
> -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/glib-2.0/include
> -I/usr/include/pixman-1 -I/usr/include/libpng12   -pthread
> -I/usr/include/gtk-3.0 -I/usr/include/glib-2.0
> -I/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/pango-1.0
> -I/usr/include/gio-unix-2.0/ -I/usr/include/atk-1.0 -I/usr/include/cairo
> -I/usr/include/gdk-pixbuf-2.0 -I/usr/include/freetype2
> -I/usr/include/pixman-1 -I/usr/include/libpng12 -I/usr/include/evince/3.0
> -DUSE_EVINCE -D_HAVE_FLUIDSYNTH_   -D_HAVE_RUBBERBAND_   -D_HAVE_PORTAUDIO_
> -pthread   -I/usr/include/aubio     -D_HAVE_PORTMIDI_ -D_HAVE_X11_ -MT
> generate_source.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/generate_source.Tpo -c -o
> generate_source.o generate_source.c
> generate_source.c: In function ‘parse_menu_commands’:
> generate_source.c:102:20: fatal error: menu.c: No such file or directory
> compilation terminated.
> make[2]: *** [generate_source.o] Error 1
> make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/denemo-user/denemo-1.1.0/tools'
> make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/denemo-user/denemo-1.1.0'
> make: *** [all] Error 2
>
> Would it make life simpler if we returned to using branches for releases?
> Is there some disadvantage?
>
> Richard
>
>
>
> On Fri, 2013-11-15 at 22:20 -0600, Jeremiah Benham wrote:
> > I have created a tarball for 1.1.0 testing now. I had to edit
> > configure.ac. For some reason I could not push the changes though.
> > Maybe I just don't know how to do it correctly.
> >
> >
> > Jeremiah
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 6:08 AM, Richard Shann
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> >         Jeremiah - can you create the release 1.1 tarball now for
> >         sanity
> >         checking before uploading to ftp.gnu.org?
> >         The feature list for release 1.1 now looks like this:
> >
> >             Palettes of commands
> >                 Customize content and shape
> >                 User created palettes
> >             Movement Navigation Buttons
> >                 Buttons for quick change
> >                 Indication of current Movement
> >             Raw LilyPond Output
> >                 For inclusion in user’s LilyPond template
> >                 Single keypress to update the output
> >                 Menu path to each command is shown
> >             Tablature
> >                 Support for all instruments
> >
> >             Upgrade Support
> >                 Keep custom shortcuts, palettes, etc on upgrading
> >         Denemo
> >             Command Center
> >                 Can stay open while working on score.
> >                 Replaces old Command Manager
> >                 Commands ordered by their labels
> >                 Incremental search for commands by label
> >                 Incremental search for strings within tooltips
> >                 Execute any command
> >                 Add any command to a palette
> >
> >         Richard
> >
> >
> >
> >         On Wed, 2013-10-23 at 20:53 +0100, Richard Shann wrote:
> >         > I have just merged master into the stable-1.1.0 branch to
> >         re-start the
> >         > release with all the fixes. I built this version for windows
> >         (in
> >         > denemo.org/~rshann/uploads) and tested it. I have sent the
> >         denemo.pot
> >         > off to the translation project and so now we need to give
> >         the
> >         > translators time to work on the (only slightly) updated pot
> >         file.
> >         >
> >         > Richard
> >         >
> >         >
> >         >
> >         > _______________________________________________
> >         > Denemo-devel mailing list
> >         > [email protected]
> >         > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel
> >
> >
> >
> >         _______________________________________________
> >         Denemo-devel mailing list
> >         [email protected]
> >         https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Denemo-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel
>



-- 
Éloi Rivard - [email protected]

« On perd plus à être indécis qu'à se tromper. »
_______________________________________________
Denemo-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel

Reply via email to