Am 30.10.2015 um 10:33 schrieb Richard Shann: > On Thu, 2015-10-29 at 23:30 +0100, Andreas Schneider wrote: >> Am 29.10.2015 um 11:19 schrieb Richard Shann: >>> I've updated the website instructions to match - I noticed the package >>> is named 2.0.0 but I guess it is actually 2.0.1 as it is from master. >>> The instruction dpkg -i *denemo*2.0.0*.deb would still be ok I guess? >> >> Yes. The argument of dpkg -i is the file name(s) of the package(s) to >> install. >> Moreover, the version information inside the package is 2.0.0. If you >> want it labelled 2.0.1, I need to rebuild the package. > > well, it should be labelled with the correct version number for the code > that is compiled - I presume you managed to build from the stable-2.0.0 > branch if the version information inside the package is 2.0.0. I was > just guessing that you would find it easier to build from master as that > is what you did before, and then it would be version 2.0.1 and that is > actually a slightly bug-fixed version (the command to create an ornament > with accidentals above and/or below is broken in the release :( ).
I had previously misunderstood you -- the package labelled 2.0.0 actually contained the built from master. Thus I have rebuilt the current master with package version information 2.0.1 and uploaded it. Can you please update the web page accordingly? Sorry for the confusion. Andreas _______________________________________________ Denemo-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel
