I vote for option one.
--- Derby Development" <[email protected]
wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> The import
of the derby code is looming; it would be nice to have a
> decision about
the repository structure. So let's measure consensus the
> Apache way and
vote on it. :) I think that we can collate the results
> next Monday (8/23);
our community is still small enough that we don't
> need to wait a long time
to close the vote.
>
> [ ] Option 1: Keep the code and site pages in separately-versionable
> trees ( derby/site/{trunk,tags,branches}/<pages> and
> derby/code/{t,t,b}<code>
)
>
> [ ] Option 2: Put all things Derby into a single tree
> ~ (
derby/{trunk,tags,branches}/{<code>,<pages>} )
>
>
> Dan.
> -----BEGIN
PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32)
> Comment: Using GnuPG
with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iD8DBQFBJixEIv0S4qsbfuQRAsLgAKCPsTWhm56KzE3/szQEJOZsyHPeXQCgvNaG
> xO8CocfgPoo0i3i+Azdwbc4=
> =U+Z1
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
