-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Daniel John Debrunner wrote: | Derby is being sponsored by the Apache DB project and the Derby status | page states 'The Apache DB project will own the Derby subproject, and | the subproject will follow the Apache DB PMC's direction'. I assume the | 'will own' means if Derby graduates from incubation. | (http://incubator.apache.org/projects/derby.html) | | I propose a consensus approval vote that the Derby development model | follows the guidelines defined by the Apache DB project. This will set | the initial rules for development, changes to the model could | subsequently be called for and voted on using the Derby developer | mailing list. | | The guidelines are defined at http://db.apache.org/guidelines.html | | There is one difference that the Derby code is in SVN and not CVS. | | Note the decision making page at http://db.apache.org/decisions.html | and the Changes section on this page http://db.apache.org/source.html. | | The Changes section indicates the commit model is: | | (quote) | | Simple patches to fix bugs can be committed then reviewed. With a | commit-then-review process, the Committer is trusted to have a high | degree of confidence in the change. | | Doubtful changes, new features, and large scale overhauls need to be | discussed before committing them into the repository. Any change that | affects the semantics of an existing API function, the size of the | program, configuration data formats, or other major areas must receive | consensus approval before being committed. | | (end-quote) | | Dan. | | +1
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFBNfrGG0h36bFmkocRAkqhAJ9TDtcOgU3VmON/FW97oAPl5gosRQCfXqi/ rISBVSw0+rySmU+40SquvhY= =t9OG -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
