While I understand that the IBM developers may not be in a position to undo these changes, is there any *technical* reason to limit Derby in this way? If not, will patches submitted to undo these limitations be accepted?
-Brian
(1) http://www-306.ibm.com/software/data/cloudscape/pubs/cloudscape10- migrate.html#Header_15
(2) http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/ReadMsg?listName=derby- [EMAIL PROTECTED]&msgNo=411
(3) http://cermics.enpc.fr/~rl/cloudscape/doc/html/coredocs/ sqlj3.htm#1013025
