-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Satheesh Bandaram wrote:
> I agree with the observations here... It is my understanding that Derby > is actively developing on the trunk, using release branches for stable > builds, but I could be wrong. If that is the case, we could add that to > the guidelines, like Jean suggested. That is correct. I would say new features, code cleanup, performance fixes and other significant changes need to be submitted against the trunk. Bug fixes can be submitted against either, typically the trunk but if someone's itch is against a version from the branch then they should feel free to submit a patch against that branch. Dan. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFB3CYGIv0S4qsbfuQRAs1aAKDPbnjhqXjKjmlE4OQe82DP6d1RDgCgkEd0 W5HNlMqPoyFl/yN9E8uL4+M= =l+4T -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
