Add ALTER TABLE option to change column from NULL to NOT NULL 
--------------------------------------------------------------

         Key: DERBY-119
         URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-119
     Project: Derby
        Type: New Feature
    Reporter: Bernd Ruehlicke


There was a thread about this on the Cloudscape forum

http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/forums/dw_thread.jsp?message=4103269&cat=19&thread=59941&forum=370#4103269

Since this describes the problem I will just copy the content of this entry as 
my dexscription


The content of this was 

"
Hi,

I stumbled across a behaviour of cloudscape which is not a bug but IMHO an 
implementation choice. To assign a primary key to a table using ALTER TABLE all 
columns must be declared NOT NULL first, which can only be specified upon 
column creation (no ALTER TABLE statement exists to change the NOT NULL 
property of a column).

Most databases I know do two things differently:
1) when a primary key is assigned all pk columns are automatically set to NOT 
NULL, if one of them contains NULL values, the ALTER TABLE statement fails
2) it is possible to alter the column to set the NOT NULL property after column 
creation (fails when there are already records containing NULL values)

If I have understood the limitations correctly in Cloudscape I have no choice 
but to remove and re-add the column which is supposed to be used in the primary 
key, if it is not already declared as NOT NULL. This means that in the case of 
a table containing valid data (unique and not null) in the column in all 
records, I would have to export the data, remove and re-add the column and 
reimport that data, which would not be necessary e.g. in Oracle or MaxDB.

Is it possible to change that behaviour or is there a good reason for it? It 
looks as if it makes the life of the user more difficult than necessary for 
certain metadata manipulations. Making it possible to alter the NOT NULL 
property of a column would solve this and IMHO having a primary key constraint 
do this implicitly makes sense as well. 

Thanks in advance for any insight on this,

Robert"



-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
If you want more information on JIRA, or have a bug to report see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to