Jeff Levitt wrote:

It appears that in both of these errors, the
references to other rule
numbers in the list had been unintentionally left
out of
rrefsqlj108319.dita and that the <xref>s were meant
to be placeholders
and did not have the correct format. Attached is a
simple patch that
should correct those two errors. Jeff, can you
verify that this is the
right thing to do? If it is I will go ahead and
check this in.

andrew




Scott, which xsl file were you using? Were you using
the one from the toolkit or my modified one? Because
my modified one had fixes in it that were supposed to
cause errors like this to go away. If you were using
mine, then yes I think we should make some changes. But if you were using the original one, that is an
error that the Toolkit will fix once they catch up to
me :)


Andrew, did you attach your patch?  I didnt see it on
the email.



I tried both, although when I inserted yours I may have done this incorrectly. What I did was remove the toolkits, move yours into that space, then add without an overwrite of yours with the toolkit stuff. I still had some problems, although I didn't save the output log of that specific build. I didn't add the newest *shell*.xsl that you sent me on that specific try.
I think I also used the beta toolkit on the last try, as it was leftover from going from 1.0 to beta and back etc...


I am pretty certain that my move of your files wasn't quite correct.

scott

Reply via email to