Re: (Derby 167) was Re: [Patch] Re: About improvement of DERBY-134

3 Apr 2005 07:59:55 -0000

Right... Option 1, adding GENERATED BY DEFAULT AS IDENTITY would be great.

Satheesh

Kathey Marsden wrote:
Danesh Irani wrote:

  
Hello Kathey,

Christian when reporting Derby-167 had a few possible solutions, is
Satheesh's proposed SQL Standard way included in one of those? If not
could you perhaps elaborate a little on what Satheesh proposed.
Personally I think all 3 of Christians solutions would add value in
terms of flexibility to Derby.

Thanks
~Danesh
 


    
I couldn't find Satheesh's mail but yes it was regarding option 1,
generated by default.  I  looked up the SQL syntax  in the sql standard
and put a comment in the JIRA  entry. 

Kathey

Reply via email to