Jeremy Boynes wrote: > > I am going to go through the client code and switch the usages to the > base class (which declares the methods being used) and then change the > hierarchy here as proposed.
Hi Jeremy, I would vote -1 on the restructuring on the basis that I think that we should slow down here. We have people active in this project from around the world who deserve the opportunity to contribute their thoughts and I still see active discussion around this issue. I personally have concerns about embedded/client compatibility and in general would like to know what your thoughts are on embedded/client compatibility in your restructuring of the client. I know that this time offers us a unique opportunity to change the behaviour of client, but I want to establish that the goals in doing so are to make it more compatible with the embedded driver. I think that is very important. Kathey
