I just opened a new Jira issue for documenting the Derby Network Client: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-261
I am in the process of implementing the goals outlined in that issue. However, as I mentioned in the entry, we don't have resolution on whether to completely remove information on using the IBM DB2 JDBC driver (and possibly create an external whitepaper at some point), or whether to create a new section in the Server and Admin guide that describes the differing syntax, along with some examples, should a user wish to use that driver instead of the new Network Client. So far we have one voice of support for: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.db.derby.devel/3519 and one against: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.db.derby.devel/3478 Are there any other opinions out there? I'd like to get some sort of consensus, as I am almost ready to send a first draft of a patch for review. Thanks!
