Hello ....

I found mistake in CLASSPATH.
I misconfigurated CLASSPATH for db2jcc_license_c.jar....

Well ... I need to learn more about drivers....

Thank you for your advising !

Best regards.

/*

        Tomohito Nakayama
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]

        Naka
        http://www5.ocn.ne.jp/~tomohito/TopPage.html

*/
----- Original Message ----- From: "Myrna van Lunteren" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Derby Development" <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2005 10:47 PM
Subject: Re: "-Dframework=DerbyNetClient"? (Re: BulkInsert ? (Re: DERBY-167 has done but ...))



Hi...

but, in
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/derby/code/trunk/java/testing/org/apache/derbyTesting/functionTests/suites/derbynetclientmats.properties

it already shows:framework=DerbyNetClient

derbynetmats is included in the suite derbynetclientmats (see
derbynetclientmats.properties) - when running from within
derbynetclientmats, the higher level's suite's property overwrites the
lower level property & thus, the test will then run with
framework=DerbyNetClient, i.e. test with derbyclient.jar.

But derbynetmats is also separate suite in its own right, intended to
test the jcc driver - db2jcc.jar, which is when the
framework=DerbyNet.

Both drivers need to be tested as they're both supported by/with derby.
So, derbyall.properties includes both suites derbynetmats & derbynetclientmats.


Myrna

On 5/11/05, TomohitoNakayama <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello.

In derbynetmats.properties,
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/derby/code/trunk/java/testing/org/apache/derbyTesting/functionTests/suites/derbynetmats.properties
cofiguration was as next ...

framework=DerbyNet

I think this should be ,
framework=DerbyNetClient.

This may be reason....

#And second reason is that I don't know much about common knoledge of test
suite ;P
#I feel that derbyall test suite does not suit for my task....

Thanks.

Best regards.

/*

        Tomohito Nakayama
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]

        Naka
        http://www5.ocn.ne.jp/~tomohito/TopPage.html

*/
----- Original Message -----
From: "Myrna van Lunteren" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Derby Development" <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2005 2:04 AM
Subject: Re: "-Dframework=DerbyNetClient"? (Re: BulkInsert ? (Re: DERBY-167
has done but ...))


Hi,

Well, derbyall runs derbynetmats & derbynetclientmats. With
derbynetmats, the intent of the suite is to test derbynet, i.e.
networkserver via IBMs Universal JDBC driver ('db2jcc*.jar'). With
derbynetclientmats, the intent of the suite is to test the (new)
derbyclient - and thus, in that subsuite, -Dframework=DerbyNetClient.

So, it's not the default, the default framework is none - which means,
using the embedded driver & not networkserver at all. The property
gets set by the harness because it's in the derbynetmats.properties
file.

RunSuite derbyall should not be run with any framework properties
passed in...the individual suites will add the framework properties as
needed.

As to why you got a hang...??? If you have the db2jcc*.jar in your
classpath, it should just run, if you don't it should just skip that
test. I've not seen that test hang recently...You should check what
the last thing is the test did - this you would see in the .tmp file.
Also, do other derbynetmats tests pass? Also, the derbynet.out and
derbynet.err (drill down into the derbynetmats dir untill you find
them) will have more info.

Myrna

On 5/10/05, TomohitoNakayama <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Follows ....
>
> > Well .. I'm not sure default command option "-Dframework=DerbyNet"
> > generated by RunSuite ....
>
> This means that I wonder why default of the option is this value...
>
> Best regards.
>
> /*
>
> Tomohito Nakayama
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Naka
> http://www5.ocn.ne.jp/~tomohito/TopPage.html
>
> */
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "TomohitoNakayama" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Derby Development" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2005 10:45 PM
> Subject: "-Dframework=DerbyNetClient"? (Re: BulkInsert ? (Re: DERBY-167
> has
> done but ...))
>
> > Hello.
> >
> > I have tried alljava test suite , but failed in executing
> > DerbyNetAutoStart.
> > Many hours but the test does not finised.
> >
> > Executing command generated by RunSuite for that test was as next:
> > Execute command:
> > java -DjavaCmd=java -Dframework=DerbyNet -Dtimeout=60 -Djdk12te
> > st=true -Doutputdir=C:\ProgramDev\derbyUser\derbyall.20050510\derbyall\derbynetm
> > ats\DerbyNet\derbynetmats -Dtopsuitedir=C:\ProgramDev\derbyUser\derbyall.2005051
> > 0\derbyall\derbynetmats\DerbyNet -Dtopreportdir=C:\ProgramDev\derbyUser\derbyall
> > .20050510\derbyall\derbynetmats -Drundir=C:\ProgramDev\derbyUser\derbyall.200505
> > 10 -DtestSpecialProps=derby.debug.true=enableBtreeConsistencyCheck^derby.stream.
> > error.logSeverityLevel=0^excludeJCC=at-or-after:3.0,when-at-or-before:jdk1.3.1^r
> > unwithj9=false -Dsuitename=derbynetmats:derbynetmats -Dtopsuitename=derbyall
> > org
> > .apache.derbyTesting.functionTests.harness.RunTest
> > derbynet/DerbyNetAutoStart.ja
> > va
> >
> > Seeing next url , I found option of "-Dframework=DerbyNetClient" is
> > needed
> > for RunTest.
> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/derby/code/trunk/java/testing/README.htm
> >
> > Adding above option to RunSuite also.
> > After that test seems to be done.
> >
> > Well .. I'm not sure default command option "-Dframework=DerbyNet"
> > generated by RunSuite ....
> >
> > Best regards.
> >
> > /*
> >
> > Tomohito Nakayama
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > Naka
> > http://www5.ocn.ne.jp/~tomohito/TopPage.html
> >
> > */
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "TomohitoNakayama" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "Derby Development" <[email protected]>
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2005 8:37 PM
> > Subject: Re: BulkInsert ? (Re: DERBY-167 has done but ...)
> >
> >
> >> Hello.
> >>
> >> I see.
> >> I understood bulk insert.
> >> Thank you.
> >> Now, I have just tryed derbyall-test problem and there seems to be
> >> trouble in derbynet/DerbyNetAutoStart..
> >>
> >> I will report it in detail later.
> >>
> >> Best regards.
> >> /*
> >>
> >> Tomohito Nakayama
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >> Naka
> >> http://www5.ocn.ne.jp/~tomohito/TopPage.html
> >>
> >> */
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: "Kathey Marsden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> To: "Derby Development" <[email protected]>
> >> Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2005 5:02 AM
> >> Subject: Re: BulkInsert ? (Re: DERBY-167 has done but ...)
> >>
> >>
> >>> Satheesh Bandaram wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> BulkInsert is an internal mechanism, that gets used when you import
> >>>> data into a table, using Derby's import mechanism.
> >>>> (SYSCS_UTIL.SYSCS_IMPORT_TABLE
> >>>> <http://incubator.apache.org/derby/docs/ref/>) This is not directly
> >>>> exposed to applications using JDBC or SQL, so there is no way to
> >>>> directly invoke it. If you write some test cases for your feature
> >>>> using this procedure, you are testing bulkInsert code. Are you
> >>>> familiar with importing/exporting tables? Looking at Derby manuals
> >>>> for
> >>>> information would be very useful.
> >>>
> >>> I think you could add a test to tools/ieptests.sql
> >>> which tests loading a table with an identity column.
> >>>
> >>> Kathey
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> No virus found in this incoming message.
> >>> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> >>> Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.11.6 - Release Date: > >>> 2005/05/06
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> >> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> >> Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.11.7 - Release Date: > >> 2005/05/09
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> No virus found in this incoming message.
> >> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> >> Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.11.7 - Release Date: > >> 2005/05/09
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > No virus found in this outgoing message.
> > Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> > Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.11.7 - Release Date: 2005/05/09
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> > Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.11.7 - Release Date: 2005/05/09
> >
>
> --
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.11.7 - Release Date: 2005/05/09
>
>


--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.11.7 - Release Date: 2005/05/09

--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.11.8 - Release Date: 2005/05/10





-- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.11.8 - Release Date: 2005/05/10



--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.11.8 - Release Date: 2005/05/10



Reply via email to