Thanks for applying review comments. Overall, the patch looks good.

Some minor comments:
  1. ColumnDefinitionNode: I would like to see following comments be more descriptive. Initially I thought these refer to another method, but that is not the case.
    1. +        //validateDefaultOfAutoInc
      +        //validateDefaultOfDefault
  2. ColumnDescriptor.java: Is there an extra assert for autoincInc being non-zero at line: 156? (Second constructor). Also 'static' is not needed for assertAutoinc() method.
Please apply Army's and my comments. I also invite others to review the patch, since I will be looking to commit this one soon, after getting an updated patch. :-)

Satheesh

TomohitoNakayama wrote:
Hello.

I send new patch for DERBY-167 , which is attached to this mail.
Please review it.

Best regards.

/*

        Tomohito Nakayama
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]

        Naka
        http://www5.ocn.ne.jp/~tomohito/TopPage.html

*/
----- Original Message ----- From: "Army" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Derby Development" <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 14, 2005 9:13 AM
Subject: Re: Patch again for DERBY-167.


TomohitoNakayama wrote:
Hello.

I send new patch for DERBY-167.
Please review it again.

I tried to apply this patch to my local codeline (which I just updated) so
that I could review it more closely, but the patch fails to apply in
several places.

I know it's annoying, but could you perhaps "svn update" your codeline and
then re-create the patch based on the latest files?

If I can get the patch to apply, it makes it easier to review the code.
Also, I can then run the new/updated tests and verify that everything
works as intended...

Thanks,
Army




-- 
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.11.10 - Release Date: 2005/05/13



No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.11.10 - Release Date: 2005/05/13



Reply via email to