Hi, Dan. As much as I don't want to let go of this because I think it's
important and we'll need to deal with it, I agree with you that doing
this with new functionality is probably more sane than trying to make it
work with existing functionality.
David
Daniel John Debrunner wrote:
David Van Couvering wrote:
[lots of good stuff about code sharing]
Maybe a better approach would be to start code sharing with a new
feature, such as JMX support, and set a pattern using that. Then if
required the old code could be de-tangled and fitted to the new scheme.
This might be a cleaner and happier approach, evolution not revolution.
Then we get a good example, working code sharing, a new feature (e.g.
JMX) and with the least amount of work.
Dan.
begin:vcard
fn:David Van Couvering
n:Van Couvering;David
org:Sun Microsystems, Inc.;Database Technology Group
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:Senior Staff Software Engineer
tel;work:510-550-6819
tel;cell:510-684-7281
x-mozilla-html:TRUE
version:2.1
end:vcard
