TomohitoNakayama wrote: > Hello. > > I follows myself. > >> I thought connection pool worked behind DataSource interface. >> Is it impossible ... ? > > > Well ... Expression (of English ) which can cause misunderstanding .... > I meant that I want to confirm that the DataSource object in the code > is a connection pool. > Thank you for explaining. I think I understand the problem now. You are saying that internally the client is pooling the connection and reusing it, even though this is just a regular DataSource and the caller has closed the connection. Is that correct? I think you may be right. I agree that the client shutting down the database is unusual.
So is the summary that we think the exception on rollback on the server is ok in this case and we just don't want it to print in the test output?
