[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-147?page=all ]

Mike Matrigali updated DERBY-147:
---------------------------------

      Component: SQL
    Description: 
This happens from JDBC or ij. Here the output form ij>

ij version 10.0 
CONNECTION0* -  jdbc:derby:phsDB 
* = current connection 
ij> select a1.XXX_foreign, a1.native, a1.kind, a1.XXX_foreign FROM 
slg_name_lookup a1 ORDER BY a1.XXX_foreign;
ERROR 42X79: Column name 'XXX_FOREIGN' appears more than once in the result of 
the query expression. 

But when removing the ORDER BY and keeping the 2 same column names it works

ij> select a1.XXX_foreign, a1.native, a1.kind, a1.XXX_foreign FROM 
slg_name_lookup a1;
XXX_FOREIGN                                                                     
|NATIVE                                                                         
 |KIND                                    |XXX_FOREIGN                          
                                            
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  
0 rows selected 
ij> 


So - it seams to be OK to specify the same column twice - as long as you do not 
add the ORDER BY clause.  

I woul dof course like that the system allows this - but at leats it should be 
consistant and either allow both or none of the two queries above.



  was:
This happens from JDBC or ij. Here the output form ij>

ij version 10.0 
CONNECTION0* -  jdbc:derby:phsDB 
* = current connection 
ij> select a1.XXX_foreign, a1.native, a1.kind, a1.XXX_foreign FROM 
slg_name_lookup a1 ORDER BY a1.XXX_foreign;
ERROR 42X79: Column name 'XXX_FOREIGN' appears more than once in the result of 
the query expression. 

But when removing the ORDER BY and keeping the 2 same column names it works

ij> select a1.XXX_foreign, a1.native, a1.kind, a1.XXX_foreign FROM 
slg_name_lookup a1;
XXX_FOREIGN                                                                     
|NATIVE                                                                         
 |KIND                                    |XXX_FOREIGN                          
                                            
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  
0 rows selected 
ij> 


So - it seams to be OK to specify the same column twice - as long as you do not 
add the ORDER BY clause.  

I woul dof course like that the system allows this - but at leats it should be 
consistant and either allow both or none of the two queries above.



    Environment: 

> ERROR 42X79 not consistant ? - same column name specified twice
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
>          Key: DERBY-147
>          URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-147
>      Project: Derby
>         Type: Bug
>   Components: SQL
>     Reporter: Bernd Ruehlicke
>  Attachments: derby-147-10.0.2.1.diff, derby-147.diff
>
> This happens from JDBC or ij. Here the output form ij>
> ij version 10.0 
> CONNECTION0* -        jdbc:derby:phsDB 
> * = current connection 
> ij> select a1.XXX_foreign, a1.native, a1.kind, a1.XXX_foreign FROM 
> slg_name_lookup a1 ORDER BY a1.XXX_foreign;
> ERROR 42X79: Column name 'XXX_FOREIGN' appears more than once in the result 
> of the query expression. 
> But when removing the ORDER BY and keeping the 2 same column names it works
> ij> select a1.XXX_foreign, a1.native, a1.kind, a1.XXX_foreign FROM 
> slg_name_lookup a1;
> XXX_FOREIGN                                                                   
>   |NATIVE                                                                     
>      |KIND                                    |XXX_FOREIGN                    
>                                                   
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>   
> 0 rows selected 
> ij> 
> So - it seams to be OK to specify the same column twice - as long as you do 
> not add the ORDER BY clause.  
> I woul dof course like that the system allows this - but at leats it should 
> be consistant and either allow both or none of the two queries above.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to