David Van Couvering wrote: > Hi, all. I am thinking it would be beneficial to provide a partial patch > of the network client i18n be submitted to the codeline. This would be > the general framework and about 100 converted messages. > > I am worried that if I wait until it's all done, it's a lot of messages, > and the reviewer would have a hard time working through it all. The > other advantage is that reviewers can catch any issues before I convert > the all of the messages, potentially saving me a lot of time. The > observed behavior change for the user would be the following: > > - Some percentage of exceptions will have valid SQL states rather than > null SQL staes > - Some messages have changed slightly (some of them were worded pretty > "sparsely", like "Driver not capable") > - There is a new default error code for network client exceptions that > is more in line with the error codes coming from the server > > Would a partial checkin of the i18n be acceptable, or does someone have > a strong objection to this?
There have been several previous discussions, all agreeing that incremental development is a good thing, thus partial checkins are allowed of features. Obviously such a checkin should continue to pass all tests. Dan.
