TomohitoNakayama wrote: > Hello. > > I may misunderstand the version number scheme .... > > The fourth digit of the first release for first version of specified > third digit is not always "1" ?
Correct, it could be any value. > If rc2 was failed and rc3 was passed in Dan's example , version number > of released program is 10.1.2.2 ? Could be, or could be a higher number. The sequence could go somthing like (as an example) 10.1.2.0 - first 10.1.2 *sanpshot* 10.1.2.1 - second 10.1.2 *snapshot* 10.1.2.2 - rc1 10.1.2.3 - rc2 10.1.2.4 - rc3 and official release Dan.
