As far as the design and code, well, don't we need to finish commenting on the proposal and then agree we want to proceed via a Vote or not - I would have assumed so, expecially for such a big feature. Hence, one is always taking of risk to implement something before the proposal has been approved by a community, no? ;)
Also, am seeing that we're recoding comments here in this thread and within the JIRA - shouldn't we try to record all comments in JIRA rather than doing it at several places? just wondering - I understand email is fine but it is more for a manageability aspect that ideally it would be good to have comments in the JIRA ;) - but that is just my view...
Cheers,
--francois
On 10/26/05, Satheesh Bandaram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks for the suggestion and any comments, Francois... I see this
proposal kind of like functional specification... If I put this on a
WIKI, could it be changed in a way it may not match my design or code?
There is some implementation of GRANT and REVOKE DDLs in my client and
it has been there for sometime now.... While it is possible to make
changes to the syntax or design, WIKI may diverge from the proposal I am
implementing too much.
Let me know what you think about this.. It may be good to have some
initial discussion here to see where it is going.
Satheesh
Francois Orsini wrote:
> Thanks Satheesh - Yes I replied in the other thread - I'll be posting
> comments in the JIRA unless we want to have a WIKI page to evolve the
> proposal document as feedback is being fed (since Wiki supports
> versioning).
>
> --francois
