Francois Orsini wrote: > Agreed since we always made it clear that users could be defined at the > system and/or database level ;) > > However, even as of today, databases can be dependent on users defined > at the system level if you have 'derby.database.propertiesOnly' set to > false which is the default I believe ;) > > What I meant to say is: (and this was in the context of Grant&Revoke > access to database(s) when users are defined at the system level in my > case which I think we'll be the most popular choice - 80/20 rule)
Yep, flexibility is good. As long as we continue to support self-contained databases. A system database would be a significant new feature. Of course, I'm unclear on exactly what you are proposing, is it a new authentication scheme or something else? I eagerly await the functional spec/proposal. :-) Dan.
