[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Katheshould be fine. I haven't tested this though. > > I think the properties should be changed on the trunk and then merged > to the branch. This might be a good time to fix up all the property > issues in DERBY-330, in addition to these. > Are you volunteering?
- Re: [VOTE] 10.1.2.0 release Kathey Marsden
- Re: [VOTE] 10.1.2.0 release Oyvind . Bakksjo
- HEADS UP: DERBY-330 commit is huge (was: Re... Oyvind . Bakksjo
- Re: HEADS UP: DERBY-330 commit is huge ... Knut Anders Hatlen
- Re: HEADS UP: DERBY-330 commit is huge Dyre . Tjeldvoll
- Re: HEADS UP: DERBY-330 commit is h... Oyvind . Bakksjo
- Re: HEADS UP: DERBY-330 commit is huge Daniel John Debrunner
- Re: HEADS UP: DERBY-330 commit is h... Andrew McIntyre
- Re: HEADS UP: DERBY-330 commit... Daniel John Debrunner
- Re: HEADS UP: DERBY-330 co... Andrew McIntyre
- Re: [VOTE] 10.1.2.0 release Andrew McIntyre
