[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6128?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13611974#comment-13611974
 ] 

Dag H. Wanvik commented on DERBY-6128:
--------------------------------------

EmbeddedConnectionPoolDataSource40 definitely requires one, at least. I must 
have missed this one when I added SerialVersionUID to the other data source 
classes that were lacking it (found it when I reworked the data sources for 
CP2).
                
> Examine Derby classes to determine if we need to add serialVersionUID to any 
> of them
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-6128
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6128
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Task
>            Reporter: Rick Hillegas
>         Attachments: SerializableLister.java
>
>
> The discussion on DERBY-6124 has raised the possibility that we may need to 
> add serialVersionUIDs to some serializable Derby classes. Without the 
> serialVersionUIDs, Derby may encounter deserialization errors on objects 
> which were serialized by one version of Derby or the JVM and then 
> deserialized by another version of Derby or the JVM.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to